Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Blade plan, 2 tubes + Cellophane/Poly

  1. #1

    Default Blade plan, 2 tubes + Cellophane/Poly

    Here's what I'm currently planning for my blade to use with a 10 Watt greenie from LedEngin.....

    I have a thin wall 1 inch outer tube.
    I also have a smaller thick walled 3/4 tube.
    A tip from clear resin that fits inside the 3/4 tube then steps up to fit inside the 1 inch tube.

    My current plan is to sand the inside of the 1" tube, and both the inside and outside of the 3/4 inch tube. Then I read about the cellophane with the Corbin film... which I presume would also work with what I'm doing.

    First... are two tubes really neccesary? Will it help any? I could always just use the single tube.

    My current thought is to sand the inside of the outer tube, fill it with Cello then install the inner tube, sanded inside and out.... then maybe toss some cellophane inside the 3/4 tube? Overkill? Maybe even entirely fill (or almost) the gap between tubes with cello?

    It's kind of new territory with the 10 watt LED, but since I'm using a couple buckpucks to drive it there won't be any extension/retraction anyway. General thoughts of more experienced folks.... more lumens means more diffusion needed?

  2. #2

    Default

    That sounds like it would be pretty heavy... and an unbalanced saber isn't much fun. (unless you're going to offset the weight of the blade by filling the pommel with lead)

    As for sanding the inside and outside, I've tried it, and personally I think it adds to the look. I'm assuming you're trying to get a "core" effect. I did a thickwall 3/4" blade, sandblasted the inside, sanded the outside, then put in Corbin film followed by cellophane. It really turned out nice, very even, gave it the "core" look, and kept it from looking like a "light in a tube."

    I'm sure doing the same thing to a 1" thickwall blade would get similiar results... 3/4" is just my personal preference.

    Hope this helps you.

    -Luke


    Those who have earned the right to boast have no need to.

  3. #3

    Default

    How do you sandblast the inside of the blade? What kind of blasting setup do you have?

    I sandblasted the outside, and the improvement was fantastic. It's a bummer how fragile it is, though - any dings on the sanded blade are much more noticeable than on unsanded.
    My MHS:

  4. #4

    Default

    well after dueling or wackingit around it will smooth the blade back out. you could take a dowel rod or something with a bit of stiff foam on it then glue or whatever some sand paper to it then shove it in the blade, stick it in the chuck of a drill and just spin the crap out of it.
    Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex. - Albert Einstein

    Reaganomics not Obamanomics


  5. #5

    Default

    I bought a sand/mdeia blaster for about $40 from Harbor Freight tools..

    I also use it to 'etch/blast' chrome/metal pieces to add etching effects to certain pieces..

  6. #6

    Default

    Yeah, I'm starting to think it would be too heavy. (2 Tubes were just how blades were done last time I made a saber a couple of years ago... LOL.)

    The film seems a lot easier, and lighter in the end.

    Yes, I would like some coring effect, but when I placed my TCSS order I didn't think to add in the film, and being the impatient &*^$^&$ I am, I don't want to wait.

    Sanding the inside (I use a metal rod with a sticky 6" sanding disc folded over it. About 60-80 grit, spun with a drill) would be kind of like the Corbin film, wouldn't it?

    Not that it really matters huge anyway.... the buckpucks are just on/off. (Although I plan to try it with a large capacitor on the battery power side, post switch and see if it ramps up/down then).

  7. #7

    Default

    I've been sanding the insides of my blades for a few months now, and it does produce an effect similar to Corbin's film. You'll get a coring effect depending on what grit paper you use, and it also allows the blade to be lit to the edges when viewed from an angle...making the blade look more like a solid energy beam, rather that a light in a tube. Clean the tube well before inserting the polypropolyne/cellophane to reduce the bright specks that dirt will cause, and you'll have a very bright and evenly lit blade.

    Got a question? Start Here. Have you tried the Thread Index yet? Most questions can be answered there.

  8. #8

    Default

    Awesome, sounds like a plan. I know about the cleaning, same issue with using 2 tubes. Any speck sticks out like a sore thumb.

    I blow it out, the go through with a shop rag soaked in solvent (I think it was denatured alchohol?) and poke the rag through a couple times with the sanding stick.

    I'm getting excited to see what 10 Watts/500 Lumens of green look like! ;-P

  9. #9
    Youngling
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    257

    Default

    Jay-Gon - from what you said, do you find you get a better effect with polyP/cellophane and the inside sanded than with the 2 films (polyP and Corbin's) in an unsanded blade? Or would you say it's equivalent brightness and evenness, but with the bonus of appearing lit to the edges?

  10. #10

    Default

    Yeah, the brightness and eveness is about the same, but the kicker is the appearance of being lit to the edge of the tube. You also lose the seam where the Corbin film overlaps itself as well.

    Got a question? Start Here. Have you tried the Thread Index yet? Most questions can be answered there.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •