Thick vs Thin

[Eco]

Please choose that which fits nicely into your version of the truth.

Hah, I think that sums the whole argument up nicely.

[Novastar]

Ah, Eco... what you say and what ARKM said... this is more right than all of you know.

Because... "from a certain point of view"... I believe thin-walled blades *CAN* be made to be brighter than an "identically made" thick-wall blade. However... the opposite can be made true if the blades are not designed the same.

This applies to sound as well. Which I've mentioned in many threads--"so-so" speaker + EXCELLENT resonance = WOW!! ... ... but "good" or "great" speaker + garbage resonance = average sound.

Finally... as the final punctuation is put on irony:

Note: Nova uses mostly thinwall...

This is... true and at the same time FALSE... depending on your POV, as we have:

* From 2005-early 2007... I used nothing BUT thick-walled blades!

* BOP I used entirely thick-walled blades, all with Corbin film, with maybe one or two exceptions (I think the Skyblade sabers were TCSS "milky white" diffuser core)

* BOP II... ... used ENTIRELY thick-walled blades... with the possible exception of a later performance where I installed a thin-walled blade in Dani Cox's saber (Alexandra Novastar)... as a test. This performance was not seen on public video.

In fact... there are many live performances of BOP I and II that I have not shown via public video!

* I started thinking about thin-walled blades for BOP III as BOP II came to its completion. I tested them... and never looked back.

So... what Fender said *IS* true...
...
...

...

FROM A CERTAIN POINT OF VIEW!

[Eco]

FROM A CERTAIN POINT OF VIEW!

A certain point of view?
But you told me Vader killed my father!