Ok, so I know this will probably get me banned, but...

**bubbalew** · 05-09-2009, 05:59 AM

Hope to see it soon. Grew up on the original and DS9 was my favorite of the spin-offs.

**JediTom** · 05-09-2009, 06:54 AM

I like all Sci-Fi, it started for me with Star Trek watching it (First run) when I was 4 or 5 years old.

I went and saw Star Trek Friday night in digital. It has a lot of action a great story and I will go see it again! maybe a few more times!!

I recommend it to anyone that likes Sci-Fi.

I can't wait till the next one!

**chaos** · 05-09-2009, 08:01 AM

I'm not a Star Trek fan but I'd still go and see this new film as it looks pretty cool.

**Barmic Rin** · 05-09-2009, 09:57 AM

I was more TNG than any other, though i'm seeing at the iMax in a week or so.
Saw the trailer & me & my best mate both had the look of 'Who's going to admit that looks awesome?'

LOL!!

And no, your'e not alone in thinking Space: Above & Beyond was underrated, though I hate the way they squeezed too much in to the last few episodes without explaining it all.

Also: FIREFLY!!!!!! WOOT!!!!!!!!

**37H4N** · 05-09-2009, 02:36 PM

Saw it with some friends who invited us to the midnight showing thursday (or should I say friday?

) My dad didn't get to go since he had work the next day so I went with him again the next day. lol

I just have one word for it... EPIC! Totally got me back into ST. The actors were amazing, zachery quinto was an awesome spock the guy that did kirk was good and whoever played "bones", OMG spot... on!

Awesome, awesome film. And of course you have to applaud ILM for their continued amazing work.
So huh, SW has even infiltrated star trek!

And yes, Firefly is awesome! That show was a "mighty fine shindig!"

**Jedi-Loreen** · 05-10-2009, 12:10 AM

Tha actor who played Dr. McCoy was Karl Urban, who played Eomer in The Lord of the Rings movies. Simon Pegg (Sean of the Dead) played Scotty.

**thejedilestat** · 05-10-2009, 12:15 AM

Originally Posted by bubbalew

Hope to see it soon. Grew up on the original and DS9 was my favorite of the spin-offs.

DS9 was my fave spin off aswell quarks cousin was my fave

**Darth Cyto** · 05-10-2009, 08:50 AM

yes i watched it yesterday, which was saturday. it was awesome. but me and my friends wanted to go in full STAR WARS costume just to piss people off.

**Nightwing** · 05-10-2009, 01:26 PM

This is not the Star Trek you know. At all.

Star Trek is an insanely fast and fun re-imagining of the Star Trek franchise, and it generally works. Those who pine for a methodical, thought-provoking film may be disappointed, as this film makes momentum its primary concern. If the 1978 Star Trek: The Motion Picture was focused on slow plot development with minimal action, then this new Star Trek is its polar opposite. While there is plenty of character definition and development, this film does it in a very quickly-cut style, giving us hundreds of great character "snippets" rather than a few dozen longer sequences. Sadly, the film is perhaps too focused on the momentum, often interweaving too many subplots into the narrative in order to keep the pace going strong. It's a trade-off, and while I'm not sure it was for the best, it certainly keeps the film interesting, which is, at the very least, fun.

"Fun" may be the key word in this new film, which seemingly ditches the science fiction "thinker" feel of the old Star Trek for a much more exciting narrative. Humor similar to that seen in Star Trek IV (the one with the whales) abounds in this film, which may annoy some and thrill others.

The new Trek crew is much more evenly-balanced than the old. While the Original Series shoved characters like Uhura, Chekov, Sulu, and Scotty to the background, this film gives each crewmember their own spotlight, usually seamlessly.

Chris Pine's portrayal of James T. Kirk is remarkable in that the viewer is not constantly reminded of William Shatner, as there aren't too many comparisons to be drawn. While Shatner's Kirk was a slightly foolish risk-taker, Pine's Kirk is a younger, brasher, and much more thrill-seeking character. He doesn't show the maturity of Shatner's Kirk in this film, but the ending certainly seems to suggest that we will see that in the sequels.

Zachary Quinto's Spock is one of the most significantly different portrayals, as he does not have the complete emotional control that Leonard Nimoy's version of the character possessed. This Spock is shown to be a somewhat conflicted character, constantly confused by his half-Human-half-Vulcan heritage. It's enjoyable to watch, though I do wonder how future storylines will deal with the fact that Spock is now a much more emotional character. Will he still retain his reliance on logic? It seems essential to the character, so I hope so. In any case, Quinto plays the character extremely well, to the point where one actually forgets Nimoy's famously powerful voice, even despite Nimoy's appearance as Spock in the film.

Leonard "Bones" McCoy may be my favorite re-imagining of any of the characters. Karl Urban, known for his Rohirrim-mustering in The Lord of the Rings, plays the slightly manic and constantly paranoid McCoy in such a sensical-yet-constantly-humorous way that the viewer cannot help but be entranced at his every appearance. He can switch from being hilarious to completely serious and dramatic at a split-second's notice, and with absolutely no sign of inconsistency. This McCoy is simultaneously accurate to the original character and completely different, all while being wholly entertaining.

The characters of Scotty and Chekov are played mostly for laughs, and while 80% of the time it works, every fifth gag comes off as childish and stupid. Hopefully that'll change by the time the second film rolls around,

The villain of the film, Nero, is a little bit underdeveloped. Star Trek: Countdown, a comic book prequel to the film, developed Nero's character in an amazing way. However, his portrayal in this film is hampered by the fact that certain very important scenes for Nero were cut out of the theatrical release, leaving us to wonder exactly how and why this seemingly silly character is in command of the massive Romulan mining ship-turned-warship, the Narada. I would have loved to have seen more of the tragic and powerful backstory of Nero in the film, as it really developed him into a character that was sympathetic, truly vengeful, and enthralling.

One significant point must be addressed: two of the main characters become romantically involved. Every time I hear myself or anyone else bring up that relationship, I have to stop and take a moment to gather my scrambled thoughts up off the ground. While the film certainly explains why their coupling should occur, it is still very off-putting. However, the humorously shocked reactions of the other characters to this relationship both acknowledge and alleviate viewers' concerns.

Some of the plot choices in Star Trek are confusing. Why exactly did the writers feel the need for a Willy Wonka-style "Scotty's stuck in a water pipe" scene? It added NOTHING. Also, the reveal of the film's backstory was badly done, leaving many--including myself--scratching their heads as to why the choice was made to reveal the central driving force of the external conflict in such a schitzophrenic and vague manner.

Another seeming plot hole is the fact that Kirk and most of the main characters are mere cadets, yet are almost instantly promoted to being the senior staff of the Federation's flagship by the end of the film. From what I've heard, there was a bit of dialogue that was cut from the film which explained that, due to the time-altering events of the film's prologue, the timeline is attempting to "mend itself" by pushing the same people from the Original Series into their same roles, despite the altered state of the universe. That line would have gone a long way to explain things, and I'm not exactly pleased that it was cut.

There are several events in this film that are so mind-shatteringly epic that they forever alter the Star Trek universe. This new series of films is not the same Trek we've known for 40 years; this is something entirely different, slightly akin to Joss Whedon's Serenity. Some may not initially welcome the change; it took me about twelve hours to accept it. Now that I've had a good morning's sleep, I've realized that I love this new movie. It's character-based, fast, and fun.

9/10